prozz

dodano 24/09/2008, 10:47

As usual, this is question only. Hope some stronger player will comment.

@15 - isnt F10 (or something similar) better? It would be double purpose move: attacking both upper and lower stone

nare

dodano 24/09/2008, 11:29

Yes, e8 appear to be too vulgar. Imho also better divide the board by ikken-tobi (huge scale attack both sides)

nexik

dodano 24/09/2008, 12:24

@15 looks very severe and I like it very much.

prozz

dodano 24/09/2008, 12:47

nexik: how about F10 then?

Is it more style related thing or my move isn't as good?

nexik

dodano 24/09/2008, 14:02

beacuse white had two stone on 4th line, F10 don't take enough pressure on them. white stones on left side are very light. black corners on left side are still open

wysek

dodano 24/09/2008, 14:08

I like @15 too.
The white stone is dead, at the moment, and if it decides to live, black will have walls in all 3 directions.

F10 leaves much more space for the white stone so it can jump too and the D14 stone can live anytime (also walling d14 is not as effective as it may seem because l17 is low).

Moreover, @15 links black stones. In the exchange F10-F7 black is also divided.

But that's just my reasoning;)

vinhan

dodano 25/09/2008, 14:42

Thank for comment :)

don't known @15 interesting like that

prozz

dodano 26/09/2008, 18:07

I think its all because E5 :)

Aby dodać komentarz lub słowa kluczowe musisz się zalogować.
<< # >>